Ramblings on ISIS and Iraq
Last
week my twin brother and I texted back-and-forth the names of cities in Iraq as
they fell to the insurgents of ISIS, hell-bent on creating a (Sunni) Islamic
Caliphate in the middle of the Middle East.
While exchanging texts might be an academic exercise for some, with the
names nothing more than black dots on a map, they mean something more to him
and to me. We’ve been there along the
Euphrates River as it winds its way through Al Anbar Province and have driven
through the streets of Mosul, and Tikrit, Fallujah and Ramadi.
Michael
was there for the first push into Iraq and ended up in charge of nine Kurdish
villages around Mosul. His second
sojourn to the desert found him in the capital, fighting all around the Green
Zone against the army of Muqtada Al-Sadr, who today has raised a new legion to
defend the gates of Baghdad against the ISIS hordes. His deployments were certainly more violent
than mine, but both of us saw death and destruction.
I was in Al-Anbar during the surge in the
summer and fall of 2007 which gets too much credit in the US press for bringing
a measure of peace to the region at the expense of the “Al-Anbar Awakening” led
by Abdul Sattar Abu Risha and
others. A Sunni, Sheik Abu Risha led his
people in resisting the foreign fighters of Al-Qaeda in Iraq, and yet he was
most likely at least a passive encourager of the initial insurgency in the
region, if not an active participant. He
was killed on a Thursday in September just a stone’s throw away from the
perimeter of Camp Ramadi, just three days before I was due to take my monthly
turn at the base chapel. That Sunday
from the pulpit I mourned the loss of a man who had been so bold to stand up
against Al-Qaeda and wondered if peace would ever come to the country. My conclusion was that ultimately true peace
comes into our lives only when we surrender them to Jesus Christ.
Religion; there’s the rub. I still believe that faith in the Triune God
is the only hope we have for lasting peace, and yet I am mindful that most of
those who live and die in Iraq will do so as Muslims. How then, can they find peace? Is it even
possible? ISIS has joined with the wider Sunni insurgency, made up of those dissatisfied
with the Shiite-dominated government of Nouri al-Maliki and Iraq seems destined
to sink ever further into violence defined along sectarian lines, which is
making for some odd-bedfellows. Imagine
a coalition of the governments of Iran-Syria-Iraq, tacitly supported by the US,
against ISIS. What implications will
this have with our relationship with other Sunni nations that are our allies,
especially Saudi Arabia? Deep down, do the leaders of Saudi Arabia and
elsewhere want to see a Sunni Islamic Caliphate arrayed against the Shiite
threat, a buffer against Iran? Or do they believe it to be too destabilizing, a
potential threat to their own rule? I don’t pretend to have the answer, and I
doubt that there is a clear answer.
Even so, while the histories of both Christianity
and Islam have been marked by periods of violence driven by religious fervor, I
am confident that the average Iraqi citizen no more desires a holy war than the
average peasant in Middle Age France desired a crusade against the Moslem
infidels. Yet the crusades still
happened and the modern jihad blankets the airwaves and newspaper front
pages. The one definitive conclusion I
can draw is this: the ongoing war in Iraq is ultimately about power. Religion is a fantastic weapon to use in
support of gaining or maintaining that power, whether in 12th
Century Europe or the 21st Century Middle East. Those seeking power would prefer not to die
in the quest to obtain it, so recruitment of those willing to die for a just
cause becomes essential to the success of the mission.
What does all this mean for US foreign
policy? What is our best option? Is there a good option at all? Should we trust
anyone in the Middle East? Can we count on our allies to always be our friends?
Will long-time enemies become comrades-in-arms against a common threat? Again,
I have no answer but I do know this: the pursuit of power is sinful, because it
presupposes that there are to be both those who govern and those who are
governed, yet in the eyes of our Creator, we are all equally his children. I can’t bring peace to Iraq, but I am called
to bring peace to my family, to my workplace, to my neighborhood. How do I best do that? By laying down my
claims (even though they may be legitimate) for vengeance, for power, for
control, for self-righteous condemnation
of those who have wronged me. In its
place: love. Not the love of Hallmark
Cards, but a masculine love that actively resists evil by turning the other
cheek and binding the wounds of the broken in body and the broken-hearted, a
love that transcends every cultural, ethnic or religious boundary, a love that
invites one’s enemy over for a home-cooked meal around the dinner table. If I cannot love, I have no place to share
the truth, and if I share the truth without love, I am but a clanging cymbal—a noise
signifying nothing, and solving nothing. If we love, we may not find peace in
our time, but we will find peace in God’s time.
As I close, I note that while Michael and I
saw some of the same things during our deployments, he was a combatant and I
was not. I am profoundly grateful for
men and women like him who aren’t afraid to take up arms to resist evil, and
yet I know that evil remains all around us and within us. I cannot pretend that I will always turn the
other cheek, and if someone should ever directly threaten my family, I too
would find violence justified. And yet,
and yet a part of me knows that God did not create us to live as such, but we
ourselves have created this world of violence, pain and suffering. So it is that I pray: Come quickly, Lord
Jesus! May the lion again lay down with the lamb in peace!
God’s grace and peace for the journey, my
friends . . .
No comments:
Post a Comment